UFC232 Betting Tips & Plays

Chad Mendes Breakdown: This is a huge step up for Alex Volkanovski and also on paper appears to be a terrible matchup. Both fighters are well rounded and excel with their wrestling bases. On the feet the speed and power advantage for Mendes ought to be evident, where he’ll use his bigger variety of techniques to inflict the damaging strikes. In order to gain an edge volkanovski relies on his wrestling, particularly top control. Mendes is the better wrestler both offensively and defensively, never been taken down into his UFC career. Volkanovski has been taken down previously by much lesser fighters, although he’s obviously improving with experience. The durability and layoff questions are the main reasons we are getting such excellent chances about the veteran. It seems to be an obvious choice considering he seemed on the scales in shape. This battle is going to be action packed and it’s Mendes with more resources to get the finish or stand up damage and control to impress the judges.
Bet = Mendes at 1.70 (-143) odds. Risk 4 Units to win 2.8 Units.
Remember your bets according to your conservative bank roll strategy! We urge a single bet shouldn’t be more than 5 percent of your total bankroll. Read our Bankroll Management guide before placing your plan.
View our historical bets here where we’re third party tracked to ensure whole confidence for our associates.
Follow us TWITTER to find the latest updates and thoughts on forthcoming battles.
Confused about gambling? Our Betting Guide has you covered with the fundamentals and describes how to utilize the MMABETMACHINE system.
Any queries start looking for the FAQ or contact us for a conversation. We might wager on cage fighting, but we are pretty friendly!

Read more: oracledailyvoice.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>