Retraction Watch:Tracking retractions as a screen into the clinical procedure

Recent Responses

  • Professor Dr. Mohammad Tariqur Rahman on Happy birthday celebration, Retraction Watch: We’re turning nine
  • Regret on Pleased birthday, Retraction Watch: We’re turning nine
  • Lee Rudolph on Drug scientists trip up, raising meth paper to compose one on LSD

We’re on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

Delighted birthday, Retraction Watch: We’re turning nine

Nine years back this Saturday that is coming August 3, 2010, we published a post, “Why write a web log about retractions?”

Exactly What is becoming clear when you look at the intervening nine years is really what a rich vein retractions are as tales of what the results are whenever one thing goes incorrect in technology. And also as we now have done each year at this time, we’ll review just what took place within the last few one year.

Share this:

Drug researchers trip up, raising paper that is meth compose one on LSD

Evidently meth is a gateway medication … for publishing misconduct.

Scientists in Asia have actually lost a 2019 paper on what LSD may damage vision because they’d lifted a lot of the paper from a write-up which had showed up the season before in a journal that is different about methamphetamine.

The retracted article, “Long-term systemic therapy with lysergic acid diethylamide causes retinal harm in CD1 mice,” starred in Human & Experimental Toxicology. In accordance with the article:

Share this:

Writers object as “doubtful” information doom dermatology paper

A dermatology log has retracted a 2017 article by a set of scientists in Saudi Arabia after getting a complaint that is“serious about the integrity for the information. Nevertheless the very first writer of the paper forced straight straight right back, saying the move ended up being unjustified.

This article, “Successful usage of blended corticosteroids and rituximab in someone with refractory cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa,” ended up being published by Ibrahim Al-Homood and Mohammad Aljahlan, rheumatologists at King Fahad healthcare City in Riyadh and starred in the Journal of Dermatology & Dermatologic operation. It described (with rather grisly photos) the outcome of a 25-year-old guy with serious leg ulcers that remedied after the described combination treatment.

But during the notice describes, the paper can’t be trusted:

Share this:

Kyoto University suspends very first writer of retracted Kumamoto quake paper

The very first composer of a paper that is now-retracted technology in regards to the aftereffects of the life-threatening 2016 Kumamoto earthquake in Japan is suspended from his college place for starters 12 months.

Intending Lin, of this Department of Geophysics at Kyoto University, had been sanctioned by the organization for misconduct stemming from their misuse of information and plagiarism when you look at the 2016 paper:

Share this:

Sunday checks out: A sleuth whoever work has resulted in a huge selection of retractions and modifications; an “unethical, high-risk and deceptive eye that is; genetics’ high retraction price

Before we provide this week’s sunday Reads, a concern: would you enjoy our weekly roundup? If so, we’re able to actually make use of your assistance. Can you give consideration to a tax-deductible contribution to help Weekend Reads, and our everyday work? Many Thanks ahead of time.

Share this:

Forensics Friday: can you flag this paper if it had been under review?

Ever desired to hone your talent as a systematic sleuth? Now’s your opportunity.

Due to the United states Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (ASBMB), which will be devoted to educating writers on recommendations in publishing, figure planning, and reproducibility, we’re presenting the tenth in a string, Forensics Friday.

Take a good look at the image below, and then simply just take our poll. From then on, click the link below to learn the answer that is right.

Share this:

Cock and bull tale results in retraction of bovine herpesvirus paper

The ancients had a plain thing for hybrids (think pets, maybe maybe not automobiles): half goat-half people, horses with peoples torsos, winged horses and lions, you will get the image. But a chicken-cow mix wasn’t on that list … until now.

A small grouping of scientists in Brazil has lost a paper in a veterinary log for attempting to reuse information from a chicken research inside their paper on herpesvirus infections in cattle.

This article, “Bovine Herpesvirus 5 promotes dysfunction that is mitochondrial cultured bovine monocyte-derived macrophages and never influence virus replication,” starred in February into the journal Veterinary Microbiology.

Share this:

‘Not biologically plausible’: questions about survey information make fluorosis paper a banner

A article that is recent provided a stark caution in regards to the dangers to kids of fluoride into the nation’s water was tagged with a manifestation of concern following the book of an innovative new paper which undermines the dependability of this initial information.

This article, “Dental fluorosis trends in US dental health studies: 1986 to 2012,” starred in March in JDR Clinical & Translational Research, a journal that is dental. The very first writer on the paper is Christopher Neurath, regarding the United states Environmental wellness research Project, which advocates against fluoridation of water.

This article, which used information from the nationwide Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) for the years 2011 and 2012, reported “large increases in extent and prevalence” of fluorosis over that period — continuing a trend dating back to towards the mid-1980s.

In line with the scientists:

Share this:

Gravitational industries, silkworm excrement, and “putor” programs: just just exactly How did this “pure, utter nonsense” get into in a peer-reviewed log?

Often, a paper occurs this is certainly therefore revolutionary, it defies description. Therefore rather than make an effort to do justice to a paper that is recent Parasitology Research, we’ll replicate a few paragraphs right right right here:

Share this:

Leech paper nets phrase of concern

A write-up claiming to uproot the evolutionary tree of leeches has gotten a manifestation of concern following an audience notified the journal about possible issues with the information.

This article, “Phylogenomic analysis of the putative link that is missing reinterpretation of leech development,” appeared online in Genome Biology and Evolution, an Oxford University Press title, on June 19 with this 12 months. In accordance with the writers — a team that is international includes scientists during the National Museum of Natural History, the new york Museum of Natural Sciences pay someone to write my essay, Florida State University and University of Gothenburg in Sweden — their results:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>